Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: A university should focus more on its facilities, such as libraries. computers or laboratory. rather than on hiring famous teachers
Nowadays, in order to enhance the popularity of the universities, universities would like choose to hire more professors Whether this measure is more effective compared with upgrading campus facilities has drawn a wide attention. As far as I am concerned, focusing more on university's facilities is more important, though hiring famous professors is necessary.
Admittedly, hiring famous professors may have certain benefits. Famous professors usually have more comprehensive and deeper understandings within professional areas, which provides students with introductory backgrounds and specific contents to figure out the theories in textbooks. However, if viewed from a different angle, it also means students have too much to digest. Students might be intimidated by too much reading materials or abysmal jargons and fell reluctant to study. In this case, cultivating students' interests by experiments and other facilities could better improve students' academic performance.
Initially, improvement in facilities can serve as a catalyst for increasing students' interests. That is to say, advanced facilities make rigid knowledge vivid for students to understand. For example, for engineering students, it is usually the case that the professor will bring students to the laboratory to demonstrate how the theories in books could be transformed into real circuit schematics. Likewise, professors in filming could use softwares, such as Final Cut, iMovies, or so, to direct students how to combine several static pictures into one moving video. Thanks to these teaching facilities, there is a higher chance that students could be impressed by the real demonstrations of experiments or softwares, luring them to act themselves. On the contrary, famous professors might be leading experts in academics, but that does not necessarily ensure that their opinions could be fully delivered to students, which plays little roles for students' s learning.
Additionally, improvement in facilities could enrich students' campus life. In other words, facilities like gymnasiums, libraries or even food courts could be a complement to academic life. By going to gymnasiums after classes, students are eligible to weightlifting, playing squash, climbing and even basketball, dragging them out of study loads. By going to libraries, students could not only find reference books for their class, but, more importantly, they could browse books outside their major according to individual's interests, such as Jane Austen and Sherlock Holmes. By going to the food court during classes, students are offered by various gourmet food, especially, Spaghetti, Sushi and fried rice, providing students with a healthy and exciting lifestyle.
To sum up, due to the reasons I list above, I would regard that upgrading university facilities deserves more more focus than hiring famous professors.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: One can learn about another person by the books and movies that person likes.
To be honest, we can get a lot of information of middle-aged and old people from observing what kind of books they read and what kind of movies they watch, because they always tend to follow their habits and values.
In spite of the information that we can learn from the books and movies that person likes, however, it is irrational for us to take it for granted that we can figure out characteristics of all people, particularly when we take young people into account.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does.
The good and evil are balanced by concealing our mundane thoughts of money. To be honest, for parents raising their children or say cultivate them can be a huge investment, in both long-spanning time and great deal of money. All of their painstaking is for only one purpose: let their children be happy, and in return for the money and effort they had spend. However, even in a material world of this age, we still have more than money considering a job.
The job gives us chances to perform, or show what we learned and make values at the field. Different jobs provide various types and different properties of work experience, which can be conceived equally based on interests and preferences. However, it happens that one offers more salary or wage than another, people would love to get higher paid or earn more to meet their satisfaction, therefore pursuing this type of jobs. But a money-based job can never give you chance to perform if it against your inner will, we all know that the standard payment of financial relatives are higher, but if one loves engineering instead of financing, then it can’t express himself truthfully or deeply as contradicting the will. Money is at most a disguised pathway for unwilling hearts.
Yet not many reasons supporting the idea that wealth brings good, and the fact that money-based job can be vicious as well as misleading. Jobs like drug dealer or prostitute earns a lot but totally bad and illegal that ruins from life to life. Money is no wrong at all, the truth is we are motivated or lured too much by frivolity, a desire of an extravagant life always affects us to make wrong decision, therefore we should never put the aspect of money at first place considering a job.
Think of a real reason to motivate us and make values that share inspiration, think of a real happiness to get the chance to express our heart, think that the money alone is never enough for a real good job.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important investment for a company is to spend money on improving the work skills of its employees.
It is a widely-accepted concept that a big or huge enterprise mostly devotes the majority of its fund and cost to more efficient and well-performed working staff. I have to confess that I am not quite for this opinion for the reason that there must be some other elements that could make contributions as well.
Firstly, providing more professional knowledge training to employees is also necessary. There are too many examples to demonstrate that companies failed in the end just because their outdated employees and equipment. In 2000s, the world-known Nokia company was almost second no none in the field of mobile phones. However, it suddenly collapsed in the later years of the first decade of 21st century just because the technology was not advanced any more. Seeing the loss of Nokia, it is not difficult to conclude that more advanced technology must come first when the employees have to be blamed. So, compared with improving work efficiency, acquainting them to more advanced knowledge is relatively more significant from this point of view.
Besides, another indispensable factor is that key strategies for managements. Since it is the CEO and staff of management that are mainly responsible for the operation of a company, not workers, more excellent higher levels of staff must be the essential part for a better company. Take Alibaba as an example. The CEO is such an aggressive, insightful and powerful man so that most of his decisions directly lead the company to a more and more successful road. What his employees have to do is just to follow his steps and do what they are asked to do, nothing else. With such a development route, it is even unnecessary to have more efficient workers but obedient ones.
In a nutshell, I will not consider the opinion that highly-efficient and proficient workers is the most significant element for a big company. They are important but not the most important one.