Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject. Do you agree or disagree.
不同意 男生和女生思维特点不同，个人的喜好也不同，实践表明，更多的男生喜欢理科，而更多的女生倾向于文科; 生理构造的差异造成的选科上的差异 。比如在高强度训练的军事专业，强壮的男生就更适合。
同意 天赋人权，人人生而平等与自由。 男女平等，无论男生还是女生都应该享有平等的选择专业的机会。比如居里夫人就在以前人们认为男人才能胜任的放射性元素研究上取得了杰出的成就
Nowhere in the world has the issue of female rights and interests been so
much debated as in our society. Nowadays, plenty of universities limit the
number of female students who study in some of subjects; therefore, many
people think universities should accept equal numbers of men and female
study in every subject, but others have a negative attitude. As far as I am
concerned, I think men and women should gain equal educational opportuni-
ties, but accepting equal numbers of male and female, in every subject, is
unnecessary and impossible. Therefore, I disagree with the view that univers-
ities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every sub-
ject. My argument in support of my view is as follows.
The main reason is that mode of thinking is different between female and
male. Everyone, male and female, has equal right to study in universities,
nevertheless, due to difference of in thought and views. Men and Women
may represent varied study capability. A case in point is that men may po-
ssess more talent than women in mathematics, physics and like stuff. In the
study of language, on the other hand, female shows stronger ability than
male. In the history of human beings, most scientists, especially those who
research abstract theories, are male.
Another reason is that nature decides different directions of development bet
-ween men and women. Today, although female’s right is being increased,
female still plays a different social role. Women are by nature good at house
keeping since the biological function of a woman is first to bring children into
the world and then to bring them up and it has been proved by some scie-
ntists that women are not good at business management, political administer
-ation, etc. So, in the study of business and management, requiring equal
numbers of male and female is not essential.
From what has been discussed above, we may draw the conclusion that acc-
epting equal numbers of male and female students in every subject is impos-
sible and I also disagree with this point of view.
It is obvious that there are far more men than women in college studying
science and technical subjects while when it comes to the arts, the opposite
is true. But some people claim it will cause serious problems. However, I bel
-ieve the phenomenon is very normal.
In the first place, subject selection is decided by students themselves,without
influences from universities and colleges. Studies show that of men and wo-
men think differently. Male students like to major in technical subjects, while
female students are more likely to choose the arts. This may be because it
is thought that people who major in more technical fields have a better cha-
nce to get a higher salary after graduation, since men usually take the burd-
ens of feeding the family. To women, however, what they study is nothing
serious for their future lives.
In the second place, some work is more suitable for an appointed gender.For
instance, nurse schools are open to women only, and infants’ schools like
female teachers better. This is all because they are more careful and patient,
and less aggressive in nature. By contrast, men fit the job like steel worker
and police officer because of their braveness, haleness, and decisiveness.
From my comments above,you can tell that it is unreasonable for universities
and colleges to accept the same number of men and women to study in ev-
ery subject, due to differences in their natures. It is free for everyone to ch-
oose their own way, and no one can force others to get into a certain field.
University, a place disseminating knowledge and illuminating people’s mind, renders people opportunities to further their study and cultivate their capabilities. Some people propose that university should enroll equal number of male and female students in every subject. From my point of view, this is not only impractical, but also unfeasible.
On the one hand, different students have their own research interest and study focus, which decide on their career and success. If university enroll equal number of male and female students regardless their interest, the students will lose their motivation and aspiration of study. If a talented writer is forced to study mathematics, for instance, he will not become a good mathematician, nor an excellent writer. In this sense, university should consider students’ study interest instead of pursuing equal number of males and females in one subject.
On the other hand, different subjects have their own characteristics. For example, histories make men wise; poets, witty; mathematics, subtle; natural philosophy, deep; moral, grave; logic and rhetoric, able to contend. It is common that most students in science and engineering are males, while the majority of students in nursing and education are females. Some jobs, such as navigating a boat, plying a plane and working in extreme circumstances, are more suitable for males, for males have higher ability to endure hardship. Likewise, some positions become females only, such as, nurses, baby-sitters, secretaries, assistants, textile workers and so on. If university enrollment ignores the differences in sex, a person cannot perform properly in their position.
In conclusion, it is not a good idea for university to enroll equal number of male and female students, because the characteristics of subjects differ from each other and students have their right to choose the subject they are interested
Nowadays, more and more people, particularly feminism supporters, help to improve women’s place in society. They indeed play a vital role in helping improve women’s status. However, Some of them are too dogmatic to the equal right of two genders. They argue that universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject. Although being a girl, I feel this opinion is unreasonable.
It is natural that different genders have different talents. Everyone, male and female, has equal right to study in universities, nevertheless, due to difference of in thought and views. The male has more powerful ability in logical analysis while the female naturally good at designing and making handicrafts. Hence, universities should establish an educational atmosphere for different genders in which students are more likely to be stimulated to study what they’re good at.
Pursuing absolute equal numbers of male and female study in every subject is unscientific. For example, few girls like to study subjects like mechanics and mathematics, which are favored by a lot of boys. It is also hard to find male students in nursing school. If we make a rule that seems to be “equal”, it would lead to the results that student can’t fulfill their wishes .In the long run, the development of those subjects will be confined.
All in all, I believe it is unreasonable that universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject. Giving each gender equal chance to choose majors is a much better way.
Apparently, it would seem that universities should accept equal numbers of male and female student to study in every subject. In fact, however, men and women should share equal opportunities, not the equal enrolment figures in every subject.
Among countless factors which influence my inclination on this issue, there is a most conspicuous one: different academic aptitude results in unequal percentage between men and women in some subjects. In light of medical research, as for women, their left hemisphere of brains are more developed than their right hemisphere of brains, leading to their strong suits are arts, such as linguistics, language. By contrast, men are good at science and technology due to their different brain structure from women’s. Thus, it will be a ridiculous decision to admit equal numbers of male and female students in same major regardless of their different academic aptitude.
The second reason relates to the careers that men and women will engage after graduation. As we know, no matter male or female students have rights to choose the majors what they are interested in, whereas, it may be found that some jobs concerned with their majors are not suitable for them. For example, it is undoubted that the kindergartner is not an appropriate profession for men. Besides, many companies still do not change their prejudice to female students in some fields. Sometimes, they may reject a qualified female applicant because of their discrimination attitude. Obviously, whether they can successfully find jobs is another factor that students have to consider before study.
In summary, judging from all the evidence offered, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that universities do not need to accept equal numbers of male and female students. More importantly, the equal work opportunities without sexual discrimination should be provided.
Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject. Do you agree or disagree?
In such society as advocating everyone-is-equal theory, some equalitarian espouse that the quantities of male students and female students should be tantamount in the same subject during their academic study. This issue seems to be steeped in controversy, while if asked to how to reckon it, I would take a dim view of it, as it is much too overdoing and impossible to carry out.
In the first place, as prominent psychologist Fred put it: “the interests are the best instructor”, individual interests have top priority when student pick up their majors. Moreover, interests vary even of the same gender, let alone different one. Namely, it is unimaginable that there are equivalent boys and girls in the same classroom.
In the second place, some courses such as engineering are more suitable for male students, while the opposite is true when it comes to liberal arts. From physical aspects as well as psychological term, the main reason is that mode of thinking is different between different sex. Men are apt at logical thinking, while women are inclined to thinking in image. Therefore, it is not necessary to invariably emphasize absolute equality at that kind of situation, otherwise it is detrimental to the entire society. What a disaster it should be if you experienced such condition, as you perceived half of male nurses in hospital or female steel workers tying the male ones.
Judging from all analyses offered, we might reasonably come to conclusion that, it is unpractical and uncalled-for to restrict male and female students to parallel subjects.