雅思写作部分的备考资料中,同学们需要重点关注一下真题资料和解析内容,因为这样的资料完全跟考试相关,所以同学们可以利用解析的内容总结出很多有价值的内容,下面我们就一起来看一下雅思写作范文第九部分【含小作文】的内容吧。

  the computer are widely used in education and some people think teacher

  are not play important role in the classroom .

  to what extend do you agree?(agree/disagree)

  范文1

  Computers are widely used in education and some people think teachers are

  not playing an important role in classroom. To what extent do you agree or

  disagree?

  The 21st century is the period of information, in which computers will play

  an important role in every area of our lives. Recently, computer assisted

  education has become more and more popular in primary schools, high

  schools and colleges. The computer’s multimedia abilities make the classes

  lively and interesting. As a result, some people have said that teachers are

  no longer playing a significant role in classroom.I can hardly agree with the

  m.

  First, it is the teacher who creates the software used in class. For example,

  the software may be an outline of the teacher’s lecture.If you listen to som

  e lectures, you will find that the lectures contain far more information than

  the multimedia software includes. While showing the class, most teachers will

  expand the knowledge extent, especially adding some latest discoveries and

  breakthroughs. So, the computer is just an assistant, which makes the class

  more vivid and clear. Teachers and students are the main part of a class.

  Second, computers cannot organize activities in class in place of teachers.

  For example, we often do some group work during classes, and it is the

  teachers who set the groups and control the time. After checking our

  homework, teachers will understand what the real weakness of students is,

  and adjust their classes to improve their teaching, while computers cannot.

  Moreover,the interaction between students and teachers is very useful.During

  the asking and answering of questions, students pose problems and find

  answers more clearly. But computers, now, have not that intelligence.

  All in all, although computer technology is developing very quickly and

  computers can solve more and more problems without people, teachers still

  play an important role in class. And I insist that, no matter how the

  technology develops, teachers will be in the front of the classroom forever

  范文2

  The computer is widely used in education,and some people think teachers d

  o not play important roles in the classroom. To what extend do you agree or

  disagree?

  In this period of communication,computer has been used in all kinds of fields

  widely, and plays a particular role in our lives. Especially computer has

  become more and more important in educational field, therefore dozens of

  people considered teachers could be replaced computers that will go with the

  current of the times. The above point is certainly wrong; this essay will outl

  ine three reasons.

  The main reason is that people’s brain better than computer. Firstly, people

  design all kinds of computer’s programs. Secondly, computer doesn’t hav

  e logistic ideation. Computer only can defend on that designer inputted

  computer’s programs to judge a question’s right or wrong. In other words,

  computer can’t defend on thinking that computer independently analyzes a

  question’s right or wrong. In case, designer inputted programs that are

  wrong. Computer output the result that also will be wrong. If this kind of

  problem happened in classroom, students would be infused plenty of wrong

  information.

  Another reason is that computer’s programs designed software of education

  that could be amended difficultly.If software of education of bugs were foun

  d, commonly these of problems couldn’t be solved in the classroom. The so

  ftware was amended that means total of program were corrected, not only

  parts of program were inserted or amended usually.

  Last but not the least reason is computer is mechanical,it couldn’t be suited

  all kinds of students and different demands. As students’ intellect is differe

  nt, same of software couldn’t base on every status of student to set a perf

  ect project.

  In conclusion, computers couldn’t instead of the position of teachers in the

  classroom, however computer is an absolutely good helper for teacher

  范文3

  In this IT age, computers are widely used in the classroom in order to enrich the methods of teaching. This phenomenon gives some the illusion that the thing teaching students is no longer the teacher but a computer. Personally, I disagree with this opinion.

  As another machines, computer doesn’t enable to control itself. Though computers are capable of learning from their mistakes and improving on their performance, they need details instructions from human being in order to be able to operate. They can never, as it were lead independent lives, no mention teaching students. In case a computer lacks the control of a teacher, there is no difference between a computer and waste.

  Not only this, but computers, unlike a teacher, can’t solve a variety of new problems. Everything is developing in today’s society, including education. For example, a student suddenly asks a creative question that the computer isn’t programmed for, it can do nothing, while teacher can explain clearly though abundant teaching experience.

  Last but not least, the computer can’t communicate with students from emotion. Such as an eyesight or gesture of teacher can transfer his or her idea and feeling to students. In this way, students can feel more human touch in the class. In comparison, the computer is too dry and dusty to understand.

  All in all, no matter how nice a computer is, it can’t take the place of teacher. Of course, I don’t mean that computer is useless. In contrary, I believe it will become the most powerful assistants to teacher in further.

  范文4

  Computer, the most exciting and significant invention in 20 century, will reshape our lives and our world. As a result, some people proclaim that computers should be involved into our classroom, and replace the roles of human teachers. However, I cannot agree with their point of view.

  Admittedly, as the useful tools, computers can become the optimum assistants for human teachers in the classroom. To beginning, vivid pictures shown on screen can motivate students’ interest and curiosity dramatically. Moreover, the combination of computers and Internet can provide children the abundant information. Although computers enjoy considerable merits, they cannot compare with human teachers for two main reasons.

  Among countless factors which influence my inclination, there is a most conspicuous one: computers are not as qualified as human teachers in academic fields. As we all know, students can get the final result of a mathematic question under the help of computers, however, they are still confused on the whole computing process. By contrast, our human teachers’ performance is much better in those cases. They not only can teach students how to analyze and compute the question, but also can remind them what are the possible errors that they may meet. Thus, human teachers are more adequate than computers in academic aspect.

  The second advantage of human teachers is they can guide students to deal with some psychological problems that they meet in schools. In China, sometimes, teachers even burden many responsibilities that students’ parents have. For example, as for the student with rebellious spirit, the important duty for teachers is to prevent the student from campus violence, even crime. Obviously, computers cannot do that.

  In summary, from what has been discussed above, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that the positions of human teachers are unshakable, and computers cannot take the places of them.

  范文5

  with the development of new techonology and science,computer are widely used in education.therefore,some people think we dont need teachers anymore.i totally disagree with the above point.

  there is no denying that the computer bring great benefit to people and are of great help to students.computer can be programmed to simple digits of question,as the students answer these digits,their theoritical knowledge can be reinforced.

  however,in practice and learning of complex questions,computer can never replace the humain brain or surpass the human intelligence.computer only can tell your the final correct answer.but it cant provide students opportunity to think over it,which limited their creativity.teaching itself is an art rather than a machnican activity.therefore,teachers function can not be neglected.

  firstlly.computer only can do work according to the procedure fomulated previously.they can not answer all question in defferent way.teachers,however,can teach students according their attitute.some students who have better ability to accept knowledge,under teachers'guidance,can be save time to gain other knowledge.

  secondly,facing the vivid dilivery from teachers,students can be improved their motivation and concentration.the effective communication operated by teachers not only can help students understand the knowledge,teachers also can teach students how to be a valuable people,which cant be done by computer.

  in addition,various teaching methods can help student absorb the knowledge rapidly.when students meet with the thorny question,teachers not only can explain it in different way,they also can show them the important deductive process.

  therefore,i would say teacher is the good compesation for flexiabilly lacting in the computer.i totally disagree with view that we dont need teachers anymore!

  范文6

  “Get up, boy, it is time to go to school.”

  “I dislike having get up early. I can take an on-line lesson at anytime I like.”

  It is a completely ordinary dialogue occurring in modern life. Yes, it is the com

  puter, whose ever-accelerated updating brings about tremendous changes in our sch

  ool lives. A typical application is Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI), which ai

  ds teacher to impart knowledge to student more efficiently by it’s multimedia ch

  aracters. However, a vigorous debate over the issue whether or not teacher are by

  no means important in pedagogy field has intrigued the public. In my submission,

  the computer can be great help of teacher but they can never replace or surpass

  the position of teacher. I will offer the following reasons.

  Firstly, CAI are designed and programmed by human instructor. They only condense

  parts of teacher’s experience and intelligence. Moreover, being a successful ins

  tructor requires not just these factors but a wealth of experience and interpret

  new experiences using that information. The computer after all are man-made machi

  ne.

  Secondly, the progress of instruction is complicated and complex, and the educati

  onal achievement of CAI is limited. Some sorts of course, such as basic education

  al course( 想想什么课程用电脑教不好), are not necessarily to be expressed by the

  computer to reach productive effect.

  Finally, communications and interactions with teacher and computer are quite diff

  erent. The latter is too impersonal, which ruins the pleasure of emotional exchan

  ges. Sometimes gazing at the cold flickering screen is a disinteresting and tirin

  g experience.

  Admittedly, though computer may help teacher to provide student with a richer and

  more effective learning environment, yet they can not substitute the position of

  teacher, not only today, but the future.

  范文7

  Computer, as the most powerful tool in 21 century, is widely used in education areas. Whether computers can instead of teachers become a controversial issue. From my point, I don’t think computers can take the place of teachers.

  First and foremost, computer cannot communicate with students. Every human being has feeling. Teachers are not only teaching students knowledge but also showing their loves to students when they are teaching. How to have a conversation with others and how to take care of others can be learned from teachers. For example, teacher can take you to the hospital when you are sick. In comparison, computers cannot likely to it.

  Secondly, computers cannot help students when the get confused. Asking teachers is the best way to do when students get any quires. However, computers do not have this function. Study is a two-way process, teachers can excite students’ imaginations and fire their creations.

  Last but not least, computers cannot organize teaching activities instead of teachers. Take England as an example, students need to do a lot of practical experiments, especially in physics and chemistry. When they do these experiments, students usually work together as a group and discuss with teachers. Team work is a very important part to shape students’ personalities.

  From what has been discussed above, we might safely say that computers can never take the place of teachers. We should always remember that human beings are the host of technology and computer is a machine no matter how clever it is!

  范文8

  V109 Computers “V” Teachers

  The computer is widely used in education and some people think teachers are not playing an important role in the classroom. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

  With more and more extensive use of computers in education, some people claim that the importance attached to teachers has been jeopardized. Therefore, computers will replace teachers in the classroom. However, it seems quite clear to me that learning from teachers is the most important way that cannot be substituted for students.

  Naturally, some people maintain that computer should instead of the old way of education. They hold that the strong function of the computer offers a new mode of education, which is more interesting, more vivid and more acceptable by children. The students will not face to the serious teachers and calm classes any more, which are replaced by a brand-new world offered by the Internet. In addition, this can decrease the investment on the foundational education and save the human resources and material resources.

  As an assistant, computers do help teachers with their work, but they can never replace the important role of a real teacher. The main functions of any computer are storage and calculation. It cannot think on its own anyway. All the teaching data stored in computers are the essence of teaching experience generalized by many teachers during their work. Hence, to assist education, what a computer can do is just to repeat the contents summarized by real teachers.

  In addition, each student has different talents and different defects, and accordingly, they may come across various problems during their study. Computer programmer designing the software, however, cannot predict these problems. Therefore, a single computer can never solve these problems without a teacher’s guidance

  Furthermore, if the significance of teacher has been weakened, the number of teachers may be decreased, that is to say, many teachers may be laid-off. If such a case comes to reality, series of social problems will break out, such as the drop of working opportunity which will surely make the burden of whole society become heavier and heavier.

  In conclusion, although computer-aided-education has spread widely, teachers still play s crucial part in the classroom, which cannot and will not be replaced by computer.

  范文9

  as the most important invention in the 21 century,computers have windspread in the world,and the use of it has become the necessity of various spheres both in our work and in our daily life. although computers are also greatly utilized in the education field,teachers are still playing a crucial part on the platform. personally,i believe that teachers should not be replaced by computers due to the following reasons.

  being the architect of humanbeings' moral, teachers shoulder the responsibilities of passing knowledge to students as well as shaping them to be real men with good qualities. students may learn some certain knowledge from computers which are cold and senseless, but good qualities can only be taught by teachers.

  at the same time,computers might not give detailed and understandable elaboration of complicated theories. after judging whether the answers are right or wrong computers fail to tell them why they make such mistakes. the problems can only be dealt with by teachers.

  in addition,some elementary academic exchanges,such as discussion and association,cannot be organised by computers.nevertheless, teachers make up the deficiendy.by this means,students' learning enthusiasm is greatly activated.

  above all,computers bring about many significant revolutions in the education field,but teachers are still the hosts of the classroom.we should always bear in mind that men are the owner of technology and no matter how intelligent the computers are,they are merely man-made machines.

  范文10

  Along with the mass use of computer technology in education circles, we are delighted to witness the uncountable conveniences be brought by computer. Some people even argue that teacher will not be important in classroom any more. Is this reasonable? Personal speaking, I oppose holding such a ridiculous conclusion.

  In the first place, the feature of teaching defines teachers as an essential part in education. It is well known that teaching is a process of mutual-communication: firstly, teachers impart/initiate knowledge or ideas to students, then students should promptly transfer their feedback to teachers, moreover, teachers will give students the final interpretation according to their specific requirement. Besides, teachers also can (teach students in accordance of their aptitude). In contrast, what computers can do is merely to display materials which have already stored in their EMS memory or mechanically execute operator’s commands. We actually can not image what our education will being if computers substitute teachers totally.

  As to another reason, it seems that teacher’s role as a supervisor is more and more overt. Computer is indeed a controversy, it not only can be an efficient education assistant, but also can become an addiction which includes too much violent and (pornographic propaganda). Youngsters do not mature fully in psychology, therefore, without teachers' supervision, many children would spend hours playing computer games or surfing unhealthy websites, which are regarded as a waste of valuable time and intelligence, instead of trying to have a good command of knowledge and skills.

  We never deny that computers are absolutely an available education implements, furthermore, the combination of teacher and computer technology will greatly improve our education quality. However, from all of the grounds of argument mentioned above, we can safely draw a conclusion that teacher will not be replaced by computer in the classroom.

  范文11

  v109 The computer are widely used in education,and some people think teacher ar

  e not play important role in the classroom .

  To what extend do you agree?

  Computers nowadays are more and more widely used in education. Hence, some people

  claim that teachers are no longer playing important roles in the classroom. I co

  mpletely agree with this statement. Although teacher may be more emotional than c

  omputers, the later actually far outdoes in educating students, for the following

  three reasons.

  First, it is an undoubted fact that computer are more likely to provide sufficien

  t information to students. Neither a well trained graduate from education institu

  te nor an experienced teacher can offer more knowledge than an advanced computer.

  Human brain is more suitable for creative activities, but not in conveying infor

  mation. As a result of the rapid development in technology, the computer’s capac

  ity of containing information will become much stronger.

  Second, computers are more efficient in educating students than teachers, not onl

  y because they will merely make mistakes, but also due to that the will not feel

  worn out after a long time of work. It goes without saying that teachers are some

  times complained to transfer mistaken messages to students. And the latter, lack

  of enough related knowledge, finally become the victims of such mistakes. Further

  more, as they were so tired after a whole day working, teachers are often slow in

  reaction while asked questions by students. Computers, which can never effected

  by emotional factors, have no such disadvantages.

  Last but not least, children are becoming more and more familiar with computers w

  hile they are being taught by this new technology. It’s widely accepted that com

  puter has become an essential tool for our daily life. Children could learn how t

  o master it better by the process of being educated by it rather than taking an i

  ntentional class presented by a teacher. Classroom, as everybody believes, is a p

  lace where students learn knowledge and skills, both academic and practical. So i

  t should be the duty for school to prepare students for the computer-oriented soc

  iety.

  All in all, although teachers still contribute to education, we can’t turn a bli

  nd eye to the fact that they are not important any more compared to another kind

  of tutors-computers

  范文12

  开头:

  Along with the mass use of computer technology in education circles, we are delighted to witness the uncountable conveniences be brought by computer. Some people even argue that teacher will not be important in classroom any more. Is this reasonable? Personal speaking, I oppose holding such a ridiculous conclusion.

  正文:

  In the first place, the feature of teaching defines teachers as an essential part in education. It is well known that teaching is a process of mutual-communication: firstly, teachers impart/initiate knowledge or ideas to students, then students should promptly transfer their feedback to teachers, moreover, teachers will give students the final interpretation according to their specific requirement. Besides, teachers also can (teach students in accordance of their aptitude). In contrast, what computers can do is merely to display materials which have already stored in their EMS memory or mechanically execute operator’s commands. We actually can not image what our education will being if computers substitute teachers totally.

  As to another reason, it seems that teacher’s role as a supervisor is more and more overt. Computer is indeed a controversy, it not only can be an efficient education assistant, but also can become an addiction which includes too much violent and (pornographic propaganda). Youngsters do not mature fully in psychology, therefore, without teachers' supervision, many children would spend hours playing computer games or surfing unhealthy websites, which are regarded as a waste of valuable time and intelligence, instead of trying to have a good command of knowledge and skills.

  结尾:

  We never deny that computers are absolutely an available education implements, furthermore, the combination of teacher and computer technology will greatly improve our education quality. However, from all of the grounds of argument mentioned above, we can safely draw a conclusion that teacher will not be replaced by computer in the classroom.

展开显示全文