题目：The pie charts below show the proportion graduate with science degree and art degree in a company in 1990 and 2010：
The two pie charts compare how many graduates in a specific company earned three different levels of Science and Art degree in two years(1990 and 2010).
In 1990, the proportion of graduates holding first degree of Art and Science was the same, both accounting for exactly 18%. By contrast, these figures enjoyed a significant growth by 2010 when they represented at 24% and 27% respectively，outnumbering that of Master of degree, including Art and Science.
As many as 25% and 20% of graduates in 1990 received their Master Degree of Art and Science separately, a little higher than that of the First and PHD Degree . However, Master Degree of Art since then suffered a sharp drop of up to 10% while the fall of the Master of Science Degree slowed to 17% in the year 2010.
It is noticeable that far fewer graduates in this company had received PHD of Science and Art within this decade, all below 12%. There was a only 1% rise in PHD of Science(from 7%-8%) but the 1990-2010 period witnessed a slight fall from 12% to 9% in that of Art.
Overall, although most graduates had Master of Degree in 1990, the First Degree predominated ten years later, with the percentage of PHD Degree always remaining the lowest across this 10-year period.(196words)
How many graduates earned 多少毕业生获得了...
Both accounting for 两者都占据...(独立主格)
It is noticeable that 值得注意的是
The ...period witnessed a fall... 某一段时间 有一个下降趋势
题目：Too much money is spent on looking after and repairing old buildings. Some people think money should be spent on building new modern buildings.To what extent do you agree or disagree with these views.
Buildings, whether they are old or modern, is more than just a place where human beings could escape from bad weather. Therefore, financial aid should never only be provided to the construction of modern buildings.
Just catering to the growth of urban sprawl is exactly what empowers the investment in modern buildings to be worthwhile. As an ever increasing number of people flood into cities for a better quality of life, both skyscrapers and high-rise buildings could accommodate the growing population, an effective and efficient solution to housing shortage in cities. With the infrastructure improving at the same time, this will also attract more investors and create and enhance way more job opportunities, thus energizing and bolstering the urban economy. In this case, financing the protection and preservation of old buildings is less preferable than that of modern ones.
However, such commitment to sponsor new buildings turns out to be in fact far more pricey. This is principally because when constructing a brand new building, building materials such as bricks, glass, steal , wood and so on are required and even worse more building wastes that are usually toxic are then have to be headed to the landfill. In addition to these material cost, the burden it imposes on resource scarcity and pollution could be prohibitively expensive, and in other words, never could these problems be resolved by money alone. By stark contrast, conserving traditional buildings consumes less and thereby proves to be both economical and environmental friendly.
Compared with conventional buildings, modern, high-tech buildings are also a financial failure in a sense. They do not enjoy as much special aesthetic value and historic significance as old ones do and what is worse is that they are so similar around the world that fewer visitors are willing to come and that fewer investors to establish new business. Old buildings, as a cultural heritage on the other hand, could attract millions of people and bring countless dollars and jobs for the locals. Therefore, maintaining them is not a money waster but rather a money-maker.
In conclusion, conducive as it is to urbanization, the creation of new buildings is not as inexpensive as the conservation of old ones and maybe the coexistence of both is by far the best, ideal result.(339 words)
4.高分话题表达(范文中已用红色标注) More than 不仅仅是
Escape from 拜托;免受...之苦
Urban sprawl 城市扩张
Empower ...to do sth 使能够(enable的同义词)
,an effective and efficient solution to sth 一个高效的的解决办法
Flood into 大量涌入
With infrastructure improving 随着基础设施的完成(独立主格结构)
Energizing and bolstering 加强
urban economy 城市经济
Prohibitively expensive 价格高的离谱
Financial failure 财务上的失败
Whether they are old or modern 不管是旧的还是新的
what empowers sth to be worthwhile 使得某事值得做
An effective and efficient solution to 概括性同位语
With infrastructure improving 独立主格结构
This is principally because 这主要是因为...
Never could these problems be resolved by money alone. 不能只依靠钱来解决。 倒装结构。
What is worse is that 更糟糕的是。。(主语从句)
Conducive as it is 尽管是有益的。。(状语从句的倒装)