为了帮助大家掌握GMAT逻辑题的解题思路和技巧,我们将通过例题分析让大家熟悉逻辑题题型和解题方法。接下来一起来看看今天智课网带给大家的GMAT备考内容:GMAT逻辑之CR题型解析gmat填空题

  决战GMAT逻辑之CR题型解析——填空题【什么是填空题】

  填空题,又称blank题型。通常需要通过理解题目语义,在划线部分填上一个最符合题意的部分。标志性特征:划线部分。一般来说(1)空格前是since, because则是假设题;(2)空格前是therefore, hence, thus是MUST BE TRUE / Main Point题。

  【GMAT解题技巧】

  1.填原因:同解释题做法

  2.题型: (1)A, therefore B 填写AB之间的Gap 架桥 (2)A, however B 填写A的直接原因与解释题做法相同

  例题:PG13-P503-12

  Which of the following most logically completes the passage? Most bicycle helmets provide good protection for the top and back of the head, but little or no protection for the temple regions on the sides of the head. A study of head injuries resulting from bicycle accidents showed that a large proportion were caused by blows to the temple area. Therefore, if bicycle helmets protected this area, the risk of serious head injury in bicycle accidents would be greatly reduced, especially since

  (A) among the bicyclists included in the study's sample of head injuries, only a very small proportion had been wearing a helmet at the time of their accident

  (B) even those bicyclists who regularly wear helmets have a poor understanding of the degree and kind of protection that helmets afford

  (C) a helmet that included protection for the temples would have to be somewhat larger and heavier than current helmets

  (D) the bone in the temple area is relatively thin and impacts in that area are thus very likely to cause brain injury

  (E) bicyclists generally land on their arm or shoulder when they fall to the side, which reduces the likelihood of severe impacts on the side of the head

  解析:题干:大部分的自行车头盔都为头顶和后脑提供良好的保护,但是却忽视了头两侧太阳穴部位。一项针对自行车事故头部损伤的研究表明其中的一大部分是出自太阳穴部位损伤。所以,如果自行车头盔保护该区域的话,自行车事故头部严重受伤的风险将大大降低,因为____

  A,质疑了研究的准确性,错误。

  B,骑车的人对头盔保护作用认识不够,混淆了关键对象。

  C,保护太阳穴部位的头盔会更大更重,引入无关属性。

  D,指出了太阳穴部位本身就很脆弱,是我们要找的关键对象的关键属性。正确!

  E,指出太阳穴部位不易受伤,逻辑方向错误

  以上为今天智课网带给大家的GMAT备考内容:GMAT逻辑之CR题型解析gmat填空题。更多GMAT逻辑题精彩内容,请关注智课网论坛。

展开显示全文